Awareness |
Open Access (OA), Open Educational Resources (OER), & Open Textbooks |
Definitions |
Copyright & Open Licenses |
Re-Use Permissions |
Adoption |
Benefits & Challenges |
Evaluating Procedures & Criteria |
Where to Find OER |
Featured Open Textbooks |
Adaptation |
Adaptation Guidelines |
Adaptation of Materials Under a CC License |
Citing OER in APA/MLA |
Assessment |
Tracking Adoptions |
Accessing the Outcomes |
Tracking Cost Savings |
Public Domain Slider: a tool to help determine the copyright status of a work.
License Chooser: follow the steps to select the appropriate Creative Commons license for your work.
OER Adoption Impact Calculator: Users can adjust inputs using a sliding scale to calculate the impact for their unique institutional setting.
How do I adopt an open textbook and include it in the Jax State Bookstore listing for my course?
Adopting Open Educational Resources (OER) in higher education presents both benefits and challenges:
Benefits
Challenges
Evaluating Open Educational Resources (OER) and open textbooks involves several procedures and criteria to ensure they are of high quality and meet the needs of educators and learners. Here is an overview of the evaluation process and key criteria:
General Procedures
1. Initial Screening: Verify the resource is openly licensed and accessible; Ensure the material aligns with the intended educational purpose.
2. Content Review: Subject matter experts review the content for accuracy and completeness; Ensure the content aligns with curriculum standards and learning objectives.
3. Quality Assurance: Assess the resource for clarity, coherence, and logical flow; Evaluate the pedagogical effectiveness, including the inclusion of learning activities, assessments, and other instructional supports.
3. Technical Evaluation: Check for usability and accessibility, ensuring the material is easy to navigate and can be accessed by all learners, including those with disabilities; Verify that multimedia elements (if any) function correctly.
4. User Feedback: Collect and analyze feedback from educators and students who have used the resource; Incorporate suggestions and make necessary revisions.
5. Ongoing Review: Periodically review and update the resource to ensure it remains current and relevant; Monitor for any technological or pedagogical advances that could enhance the resource.
General Criteria
1. Content Accuracy: Information is correct, reliable, and supported by evidence; Authors and contributors are credible and knowledgeable in the subject area.
2. Alignment with Standards: Resource aligns with academic standards and learning outcomes; Clearly defined goals and objectives are met.
3. Relevance and Timeliness: Content is up-to-date and relevant to current educational contexts; Reflects current theories, practices, and real-world applications.
4. Pedagogical Effectiveness: Includes a variety of teaching and learning strategies; Engages students and encourages critical thinking; Offers assessments and activities that support learning objectives.
5. Clarity and Readability: Content is written clearly and concisely; Includes glossaries, summaries, and other aids to enhance understanding; Language is appropriate for the target audience.
6. Technical Quality: High-quality graphics, multimedia, and interactive elements; Meets accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG) to support all learners; Materials are accessible on various devices and platforms.
7. Licensing and Permissions: Clearly stated open license (e.g., Creative Commons); Allows for adaptation, modification, and redistribution.
8. Cultural Relevance and Sensitivity: Content is culturally inclusive and sensitive; Reflects diverse perspectives and avoids bias.
9. Usability: Easy to navigate and use; Adaptable to different teaching and learning contexts; Includes clear instructions and user-friendly interface.
10. Sustainability: Plans for regular updates and maintenance; Mechanisms for ongoing feedback and improvement.
By following these procedures and applying these criteria, educators and institutions can ensure that the OER and open textbooks they adopt are of high quality and effective in enhancing teaching and learning.
More examples of rubrics/guides for evaluating OER are available below:
Open Textbook Library Review Criteria: Faculty who review open textbooks in the Open Textbook Library follow these criteria, which can also be a general guide for overall OER evaluation.
Open Textbooks
Here are some platforms and repositories that list open textbooks, many of which have been adopted and reviewed by colleges and universities.
OER Repositories
OER Repositories, such as OER Commons, MERLOT, and OASIS contain more than just open textbooks. They also have other digital learning materials such as:full courses, modules, syllabi, lectures, audiobooks, homework assignments, quizzes, lab activities, games, and simulations.
OER by Discipline
OER Images, Videos, Musics, and More
Open Academic Books