Skip to Main Content

Artificial Intelligence Guide for Faculty & Students: AI in Education: An Overview

Artificial Education in Higher Education: Where Are We Now?

There's no question: Higher education has a tough job ahead. Sure, GenAI may not wholly upend higher education as we know it. But it will challenge it, and push colleges, on some level, to rethink what they value and how they can best serve their students. Waiting for this moment to pass is not an option.
Swaak, T. (2024, March). AI Will Shake Up Higher Ed. Are Colleges Ready? Chronicle of Higher Education70(13), 1

Generative AI offers various advantages and disadvantages in the educational field, which are essential to consider for effective implementation. Benefits include personalized learning experiences, the ability to provide instant feedback, and support for faculty in administrative tasks. However, limitations may include potential biases in AI systems, a reliance on technology that could affect critical thinking skills, and concerns about data privacy, equitable access, intellectual property, and copyright. Understanding and addressing generative AI's benefits and limitations can help educators make informed decisions about using it in the classroom. 

Regardless of these challenges, teaching students how to use AI effectively, responsibly, and creatively will have a critical impact on their post-college career success. Consider the following insights and predictions:
 

Librarian Recommendation

Examples of How Students & Faculty are Using GenAI

Scroll down this page in ChatGpt Education for examples of how students and faculty can incorporate ChatGPT

 

Maintaining Academic Integrity in the ChatGPT Era by Insider Education

UNESCO’s AI Competency Framework for Teachers

UNESCO’s Guide for Using GenAI in Research

Education Librarian

Profile Photo
Laurie Heathcock
Contact:
5th Floor
Houston Cole Library
Jacksonville State University
700 Pelham Rd N
Jacksonville, AL 36265
256-782-5245
lheathcock@jsu.edu
Website

Auburn University Artificial Intelligence Initiative

Auburn University has created an "Artificial Intelligence Initiative' that is designed to "establish a comprehensive university-wide computational infrastructure dedicated to cutting-edge AI research and education.' Their mission includes "bolstering the faculty's AI research capabilities, fostering cross-disciplinary collaborations, and spearheading innovative educational approaches in the realm of Artificial Intelligence."

 

American Association of Colleges & Universities (AAC&U): AI Resources

 

The United States Department of Education’s AI & the Future of Teaching & Learning

The United States Department of Education’s AI Toolkit for AI Integration

Spotlight on the University of Arizona's AI Libguides: A Great Resource for Faculty and Students

Journal Articles on AI in Higher Education

Swaak, T. (2024, March). AI Will Shake Up Higher Ed. Are Colleges ReadyChronicle of Higher Education70(13), 1.

Kingsley Ofosu-Ampong. (2024). Beyond the Hype: Exploring Faculty Perceptions and Acceptability of AI in Teaching Practices. Discover Education3. https://doi-org.lib-proxy.jsu.edu/10.1007/s44217-024-00128-4

Damiano, A. D., Lauría, E. J. M., Sarmiento, C., & Zhao, N. (2024). Early Perceptions of Teaching and Learning Using Generative AI in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems52(3), 346–375. https://doi-org.lib-proxy.jsu.edu/10.1177/00472395241233290

Hostetter, A. B., Call, N., Frazier, G., James, T., Linnertz, C., Nestle, E., & Tucci, M. (2024). Student and Faculty Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Student Writing. Teaching of Psychology, 1. https://doi-org.lib-proxy.jsu.edu/10.1177/00986283241279401

Jacques, P. H., Moss, H. K., & Garger, J. (2024). A Synthesis of AI in Higher Education: Shaping the Future. Journal of Behavioral & Applied Management24(2), 103–111. https://doi-org.lib-proxy.jsu.edu/10.21818/001c.122146

Bowen, J. A., & Watson, C. E. (2024, May 24). AI Detection Is a Business. But Should It Be Faculty Business? Chronicle of Higher Education70(19), 1.

Yu, S.-C., Huang, Y.-M., & Wu, T.-T. (2024). Tool, Threat, Tutor, Talk, and Trend: College Students’ Attitudes toward ChatGPT. Behavioral Sciences (2076-328X)14(9), 755. https://doi-org.lib-proxy.jsu.edu/10.3390/bs14090755

Cutler, S. (2024, May 24). This University Had an AI Robot as Commencement Speaker. Yes, It Was Weird. Chronicle of Higher Education70(19), 1.

David R. Firth, Mason Derendinger, & Jason Triche. (2024). Cheating Better with ChatGPT: A Framework for Teaching Students When to Use ChatGPT and Other Generative AI BotsInformation Systems Education Journal22(3), 47–60.|
I highly recommend this article! It provides excellent guidance on teaching students how to use AI to enhance their understanding of a subject. The authors introduce a matrix that helps students identify when it is appropriate to use AI in their coursework and when it is not.

Vetter, M. A., Lucia, B., Jiang, J., & Othman, M. (2024). Towards a framework for local interrogation of AI ethics: A case study on text generators, academic integrity, and composing with ChatGPT. Computers & Composition71, N.PAG. https://doi-org.lib-proxy.jsu.edu/10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102831

Williams, M. (2023). ChatGPT, LLMs & THE LAW LIBRARY’S ROLE IN LAUNCHING AI. AALL Spectrum28(2), 13–15.

Blanke, J. M. (2024). ChatGPT: The Sky is Not Falling. Journal of Legal Studies Education41(1), 39–47. https://doi-org.lib-proxy.jsu.edu/10.1111/jlse.12145

Yalçin Dilekli, & Serkan Boyraz. (2024). From “Can AI Think?” to “Can AI Help Thinking Deeper?”: Is Use of ChatGPT in Higher Education a Tool of Transformation or Fraud? International Journal of Modern Education Studies8(1), 49–71.

Trust, T. (2023). Essential Considerations for Addressing the Possibility of AI-Driven Cheating. Faculty Focus. Teaching with Technology. 

Murali, M., & Wiles, M. D. (2024). Large language models and artificial intelligence: the coming storm for academiaAnaesthesia, 1. https://doi-org.lib-proxy.jsu.edu/10.1111/anae.16441

Mike Perkins, Jasper Roe, Darius Postma, James McGaughran, & Don Hickerson. (2024). Detection of GPT-4 Generated Text in Higher Education: Combining Academic Judgement and Software to Identify Generative AI Tool Misuse. Journal of Academic Ethics22(1), 89–113. https://doi-org.lib-proxy.jsu.edu/10.1007/s10805-023-09492-6